![]() Pushing the ship into dry-dock will free up an active ship slot (YAY).Players retain the use of the ship, both for the Admiralty System, and if later needed it can be restored to your roster.Some behind-the-scenes artwork from JJ-Verse Star Trek by John Eavesįor Star Trek Online players, the assigning of ships into dry-dock will have benefits: While it’s not a re-boxing system we’d (I’d) like, it’s a huge step forward.Īnyone familiar with Amarillo Design Bureau, Inc’s Federation & Empire will understand the concept, as the Klingon’s were well known for staying on a war-footing by maintaining the production of starships during peacetime and pushing them into mothball fleets for their eventual need later on. Yeah, yeah the E should have been assembled in ORBIT – but IT IS a dry dock □Īnnounced earlier today by Cameron “Cryptic Batsoup” Johnston – this new system feature was immediately well-received by the community. While we don’t have specifics on the launch date – and it’s a shame it doesn’t coincide with the Admiralty System – dry-docking essentially will allow players to ‘put the old girl into mothballs’ freeing up some much needed space in the players storage. Enter the Dry-dock (Dry Dock, Mothball Fleet, Long Term Storage)ĭry-docking will be released sometime during Season XI. ![]() Not everyone can afford to pay for storage after investing in a new ship, and for hardcore collectors like me the limit per toon was becoming a serious issue. Star Trek Online provides a limited number of free slots per toon, expandable through in-game purchases. The idea was also meant to free up space for players who were exceeding their storage limit for starships. On the heels of the Admiralty System announcement (yeah, yeah, I’ll have a review in a bit)- a way to deploy your previously acquired ships on mission – many of us in the community were wary of how the system would support our ever-growing collections with a hard cap at 30 ships per character.īack in May we proposed a system to re-box ships, not for resale, but to allow them to be used with other characters on the same account. And then there's the lingering attempt to reunite the cast of Star Trek and Into Darkness, which has been complicated by the price/schedules of Chris Pine and co.įor now, it would seem like the Enterprise is stuck waiting for its orders.This is something a player can really get excited about, especially if you collect ships in Star Trek Online. ![]() Smith, which is reportedly going to tackle the crew encountering '30s Gangsters (which would put it as a spin on original series episode A Piece Of The Action, where a planet based its society on a pulp gangster novel). Star Trek on the big screen has a few possibilities, including the script that Quentin Tarantino was developing with writer Mark L. He's still on board, but new film chief Emma Watts is deciding the course Paramount should chart from here. ![]() The writer/director had been developing a new Trek movie, one that features a fresh cast and – according to Deadline – a story about a virus threat that might cut a little too close to home right now. With various interpretations competing for attention, the studio is pushing the pause button while it figures out how to proceed, which means bad news for Fargo's Noah Hawley. Though the TV shows are speeding ahead at warp speed Star Trek just can't get out of dry dock on the big screen at Paramount.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |